
Cricket often paints contrasting stories within the same innings—moments of brilliance clashing with harsh records. That’s exactly what unfolded for Indian pacer Prasidh Krishna during the first Test against England at Leeds, where he delivered a spell that balanced between promise and punishment. While Krishna claimed three significant wickets in England’s innings, he also etched his name into an unfortunate chapter of Indian Test bowling history.
Krishna’s final figures—3 for 128 in 20 overs—told a story of both achievement and struggle. With an economy rate of 6.40, he now holds the worst economy rate by an Indian bowler in a spell lasting at least 20 overs or 120 balls in Test cricket.
Let’s break down how this mixed performance unfolded, what it means for India’s fast-bowling depth, and how Krishna can bounce back stronger.
Prasidh Krishna, brought into the Indian Test setup as part of the ongoing pace transition, started his spell with aggression and intent. His selection reflected India’s desire to bring in fresh pace talent alongside veterans like Jasprit Bumrah. Krishna didn’t disappoint entirely—he removed three middle-order English batters, namely Ollie Pope, Harry Brook, and Jamie Smith, all dangerous players capable of turning the game in one session.
Each of those wickets carried weight:
These dismissals briefly gave India control during patches of the innings.
However, that control didn’t last.
While Krishna picked up important wickets, England’s batters didn’t let him settle into a rhythm. From the outset, they looked to attack the young pacer. Every time he slightly missed his length—whether too full or too short—they punished him with ease.
England’s “Bazball” approach—the aggressive style of Test cricket championed under Brendon McCullum and Ben Stokes—found a perfect target in Krishna. He became the bowler they decided to go after. Despite the bounce he extracted and the early breakthroughs, his lines often drifted into the hitting arc, and the margin for error proved too slim.
As boundaries kept flowing and Krishna struggled to control the run rate, his economy crept upward. By the time he completed his 20th over, he had conceded 128 runs, making his economy rate 6.40—the worst ever by an Indian bowler bowling 20+ overs in a Test innings.
Records in cricket usually celebrate milestones—most wickets, fastest hundreds, best averages. But they also capture the painful statistics. Unfortunately for Krishna, this Test marked his entry into an unenviable list.
Before this, Indian pacers like Ishant Sharma, Zaheer Khan, and Javagal Srinath delivered long spells in SENA countries (South Africa, England, New Zealand, Australia) while maintaining respectable economy rates despite tough conditions. Krishna’s economy of 6.40 stands out in sharp contrast.
Such numbers aren’t just statistical—they spark questions. Can Krishna adapt his bowling to Test match rhythms? Is he more suited to white-ball formats, where he has previously impressed?
This spell could serve as a learning curve for Krishna, who has had limited exposure to red-ball cricket at the highest level. Test cricket demands not just pace, but patience, consistency, and control. A bowler may go wicketless but still apply pressure by restricting runs. On the flip side, taking wickets but leaking runs creates as much trouble for the team, especially on flat pitches.
In England, where ball movement rewards persistence, Krishna tried to force the pace instead of working over batters. His intent to attack was commendable, but without the required discipline, the plan backfired.
The experience, however, isn’t without value. Krishna now knows how quickly Test batters adapt, especially those playing under the aggressive English setup. Every loose ball gets punished. Every slight misjudgment in length brings consequence.
Despite the poor economy, Krishna’s wickets didn’t come by accident. He displayed smart use of the short ball and generated steep bounce on several occasions. His dismissal of Jamie Smith, in particular, resulted from a pre-planned field placement and short-ball tactic, indicating he can execute strategies under pressure.
Moreover, skipper Shubman Gill’s trust in Krishna showed clearly. Even after being taken to the cleaners, Krishna continued bowling long spells. The captain’s decision to persist with him signaled belief in his ability to learn and adapt mid-game.
Bumrah, who stood out at the other end with a five-wicket haul, also backed Krishna during field placements and applauded his breakthroughs.
The road ahead doesn’t get easier. If Krishna continues in the playing XI, he must make immediate adjustments. Test cricket doesn’t offer much time for recovery, especially against high-tempo teams like England.
He needs to:
If he can iron out these elements, Prasidh Krishna still holds plenty of potential. India needs pace depth, especially with regular rotation due to injuries and workload. Krishna, with his height, pace, and bounce, offers a unique option if he learns to harness it consistently.
Cricket’s beauty lies in its ability to humble even the most talented players. For Prasidh Krishna, the first Test at Leeds became a test of resilience more than skill. He entered with promise, claimed wickets, and exited with a harsh reminder of what Test cricket demands.
The record for the worst economy rate by an Indian bowler in a 20-over spell will sting, but it doesn’t have to define his future. If he learns from this outing, adapts his game, and sharpens his control, he can come back stronger—and possibly turn future pain into match-winning spells.
Join Sports Samachaar for all things cricket and never miss a moment of the action!






